But just to get the ball rolling, here's a possible theory, given a 30 day month. Early = 1st to 10th. Mid = 11th to 20th. Late = 21st to 30th. Beginning of (included in early) = First 5 days = 1st to 5th. End of (included in late) = Last 5 days = 26th to 30th.
Mar 3, 2011. #11. In text-speak, w/ = with, is very common. To do the opposite, people (used to) generally use the other slash w\ = without. I've noticed a drop in the trend of the backslash though, probably because people were confused with the ordering of the slashes and now I'd say what James mentioned earlier is the most common (w/o).
Feb 17, 2011. #3. I would phrase 1) as" has more than doubled." It appears to be comparing the cost of A now to what it was before. 2) is a comparison, but we aren't sure what is being compared. I think it needs more information: A costs more than double its previous cost. A costs more than double B's cost. Last edited: Feb 17, 2011.
It can be classified as low complex - high uncertain market on the classification grid (specific name). I assume you have a suitable expression to replace the red text. You can find lots of examples of any phrase in context if you use the forum's Dictionary and Thread Title search. I looked up in the sense of.
My other short answer. estar (root of the word"estado" as in"state") is for categories of changeable things. Health is variable: está bien, está enfermo, está peor, está muerto. On the other hand, ser is used for essential characteristic, nature (categories). if someone is just, at his core, a rotten, evil son of a bitch, es malo.
It seems to be true, as entangledbank says, that some people do use"[Someone] et al" as a fixed phrase and attach a possessive to it. When I search the American corpus, COCA, for et al's, I find 11 results, 8 of them classified as"academic". (In these, al is not followed with a period.) When I search the same corpus for"of * et al", I get a ...
Fresno CA. English (US - northeast) Oct 16, 2018. #2. In my opinion"into" is correct, and"in" is a sloppy replacement for"into". I don't think"in" has a different meaning. But I dislike this sentence, because it uses 2 different words (class/category) with identical meanings. That may confuse readers.
French and English words, phrases and idioms: meaning, translation, usage. Mots, expressions et tournures idiomatiques françaises et anglaises : signification ...
As it is a title, you can expect there to be some words omitted."Questions to experts" ="Questions that are addressed to experts" (If a document has this title, you could expect a list of questions that ordinary people have asked experts (which would the be followed by the experts' answers.)"Questions for experts" ="Questions for experts to ...
Aug 28, 2020. #3. lingobingo said: No. Classified as is correct. It’s similar to described as or categorised as. Into would need a different verb, such as sorted or grouped into classes/categories. I found the following information on the website and I am a little big confused.